3.05.2009

Jesus-ish


Lately, I have been reading a number of opinions on the word 'missional'. While I once embraced this word, as time has gone on I have come to largely dislike it. The problem with 'misssional' in my opinion, as a label or a lifestyle, is how it seems to have ended up being just another exclusive club. Generally speaking, it seems in some circles that a person who doesn't identify as missional isn't as authentic or enlightened of a Christian as someone who does.

Give a label to a concept, and people want to know what the label means, so it must be defined. The definition allows people to know when to apply that label to something; however, the definition ultimately also allows people to know when NOT to apply said label. You have to draw the line somewhere, right? One cannot say anyone can be a part of the club, because then the label would cease to have any meaning. Therefore the club *must* be exclusive, at least to some degree. Labels also require standardization. In the process of defining a label, we have to ask, "What is the ideal model of this label?", which inevitably causes there to be varying degrees of adherence to a label, and a hierarchy is born; the same hierarchy many of us have railed against in the church system.

The way I see it, the primary force driving the downfall of Christianity isn't whether we are this label/are not that label, but rather stems from the problem of inclusion/exclusion on any level. Personally, I don't even draw lines around the word "Christian" anymore, because it is not up to me to decide a person's spiritual authenticity based on my own criteria. If a person identifies themselves as a Christian, in my mind they are.

Yes, I have drawn lines around my beliefs for the clarity and safety of my own spiritual journey. I still believe the question of equality for women in Christianity is a justice issue with no wiggle room. I still believe it is ludicrous for churches to invest exponentially more in buildings and staff than in caring for the real needs of people in the church and community. I still am convinced that the church has no business in politics.

My personal convictions are useful for you to better understand me. However, my personal convictions are decidedly not useful to me in determining how authentic of a Christian a person is. There really is only one measure of a person's authenticity as a Christian; I'll get to that in a minute.

Looking around the blogs lately I am seeing more and more people say they are tired of the same old conversation; they want more life in their life. It seems conceivable to me that the conversations we've been having about emerging/missional, new ways to be/do, have one big hang-up: they are just too difficult for many of us to put into practice at the level we might theorize about them. We generally theorize about something at the level of the ideal, and in practice we often will feel we have failed right out of the starting gate because we have set our standards so high.

So then, I have decided not to set complex standards and labels on my spirituality. I'm not missional. I'm not emerging, emergent, postmodern, Christian, heretical, democrat, or universalist. I'm just Erin, and it's my heart's desire to live my life looking for needs I can fill, and then filling them. I draw no religious lines defining to who is in our out of the "good Christian" club depending on what philosophies or theologies a person subscribes to; my line in the sand only depends on how much a person lives to be like JESUS. Notice I didn't say how much a person is LIKE Jesus, because we all fail at that, but how much a person lives their life with the desire to be like Jesus.

How do I define 'Like Jesus'? Simple. We know Jesus is love. Love, well, I'll let the apostle Paul tell you:
Love:

Never gives up.
Cares more for others than for self.
Doesn't want what it doesn't have.
Doesn't strut,
Doesn't have a swelled head,
Doesn't force itself on others,
Isn't always "me first,"
Doesn't fly off the handle,
Doesn't keep score of the sins of others,
Doesn't revel when others grovel,

Takes pleasure in the flowering of truth,
Puts up with anything,
Trusts God always,
Always looks for the best,
Never looks back,
But keeps going to the end.

(1 Corinthians 13: 4-7, The Message)
You can call it missional, if you'd like. You can call it the prime directive, if that better suits you. Hell, you can call it 'pizza', for all I care. If Jesus is love, and love is manifested in the above ways, then I aim to spend the rest of my life being Jesus-ish.

28 comments:

  1. I can't remember who I heard talking about the effects of being associated with a tree of the knowledge of good and evil. It was enlightening. Regardless of whether you think that was just a myth or not, it just resonates so much for me, the dynamics and the spirituality and the psychology behind that whole deal, of people who have rather limited vision slapping labels of good or bad on stuff. I hate the labels also. Mainly because once you label yourself or someone else labels you, then you tend to stop seeing all the stuff that is not-that label. And then how difficult it is to move on and grow and change. The IC has been famous at doing that sort of thing, mereckons.

    Good post, Erin! I'm with you. The less labels the more fluid the swim :)
    ReplyDelete
  2. You got it Erin. Brilliant! Love is IT. Period. You love, you know the Father. It is what I have boiled everything down to lately.
    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow ... woman. It is eerie how I am here, all the way across the country and our thoughts are synchronized! I was just thinking today that this label of missional has started tainting the gospel.

    Let me explain.

    Our fellowship is reading through, learning through the letter from Paul to the Galatians. In the first chapter, Paul seems to be talking to them about how the gospel is being twisted, perverted, tainted. We talked about how we add things to the Gospel that is necessary for our salvation and life in Christ ... identifying those common things like don't curse, don't drink and go to church each Sunday.

    However, in my life, so much more was added ... homeschooling, being a stay at home mom, the way I dressed, etc. It really is as if the shackles are being released from my body as I shed these additions that were tainting the good news for me.

    But, now it seems that there are other levels that are being added ... this whole emerging, emergent, missional conversation has left me weary. Not just the conversation either. There seems to be some weird hierarchy being played out where one is better than the other depending on how "missional" they are. What? No!

    I have already dealt with wonderful, good things in my life being tainted because they were used to make up a formula for righteous living. I don't want that to happen with other things in my life.
    ReplyDelete
  4. I love your insight, Sue. You say

    "once you label yourself or someone else labels you, then you tend to stop seeing all the stuff that is not-that label"

    When I first decided I was "emerging", I couldn't get enough of emerging church books and blogs and theories. Now, at that point in my life emerging was a necessary step, a transition out of the institution. However, after awhile, I realized I was only seeing/hearing the same things over and over again. And it frightened me because I saw myself as still in the box, just in a new box.

    Now I find the boxes to be entirely irrelevant. I am only inside the ones I choose for myself, never in one by force.
    ReplyDelete
  5. Barb - Me too. Boiled it down till it's nice and intense, AND simple.
    ReplyDelete
  6. So Cynthia! So good to see you!

    I'm with you. I have had the spiritual heebie-jeebies about "missional" pretty much since I first heard it. Well, I liked it for a moment, but then it was quickly just a bunch of talking heads. They got bored of 'emerging', and before that they got bored of 'postmodern'.

    It really is a modern way of thinking that we have to define everything. Sometimes I feel like a hippie because all I can think is "free love". But not in the hippie sense...rather meaning "set LOVE FREE" because I'm so tired of people thinking they have a monopoly on it and that there are rules about it.

    No more formulas, no more rules, no more labels. I know I'm tipping a sacred cow at this point, but it's nice to know you're in the pasture with me. ;-)
    ReplyDelete
  7. Love - beautiful and simple. My head feels like it's going to explode with all of these terms these days, hence why I wrote in my last email to you "the emerging, missional, whatever you want to call it coz I have no idea anymore!" I think a lot of this is why I'm not blogging much at the moment. I'm not sure where I fit in. I think I should follow your lead and just be Lyn. Have a great weekend - say hi to the sea for me!
    ReplyDelete
  8. Starfleet spirituality. I LOVE IT!!
    ReplyDelete
  9. Spot on Erin, you took the thoughts right out of my head. And it's true, as soon as we slap a label on something, we limit it to the boundaries we impose upon it. It seems so very human to only trust something which is controlled, regimented. And as soon as something is controlled and regimented we don't need to be vigilant within our souls to follow it and we stop needing to trust God daily, our minds become lazy. This is why I hate labels, they dissolve the 'labeled' of any meaning it might previously have had.

    /end rant.
    ReplyDelete
  10. Lyn - I'm tired of the terms, too. Once someone breaks one out, then there are endless discussions by people trying to explain what they mean - but it's just one more thing to try to understand. I don't really care anymore, I just want to live.
    ReplyDelete
  11. Very insightful, Fiona. What you said about something being controlled and then we don't have to trust God in it anymore...there is a lot of wisdom in that.

    I know we want pretty boxes that are easy to understand and simple to stay within (if we know the rules)...but then where is the life in that? Where is the risk in following Jesus?
    ReplyDelete
  12. Mike - The final frontier, you know!
    ReplyDelete
  13. I loved this post Erin! This is a great observation:

    "Generally speaking, it seems in some circles that a person who doesn't identify as missional isn't as authentic or enlightened of a Christian as someone who does."

    I am with you.. I want to be Jesus-ish!
    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks Bob! I just want to keep it simple...not that keeping it simple is any more enlightened than those who have other approaches, but it's what works for me.
    ReplyDelete
  15. Jesus'ish. Love it. Let's start a trend and ask each other and talk about with each other the value and contextual relevance of being Jesus'ish in post-modern society. We can get our own vocab going with cool buzz words to help identify that we are a part of the Emerging Missional Jesus'ish movement. We can say things like, "That church is involved in Jesus'ish ministry." Or we can blog, synchroblog if you like, such cutting edge Jesus'ish topics like "The Incarnational Praxis of Jesus'ish Living".

    Rock on my Jesus'ish Sister. In a Jesus'ish sort of way that is.

    :-)
    ReplyDelete
  16. I get the sense this is just another sacred cow, Pam. Whodathot?
    ReplyDelete
  17. Thanks Gary. You might be surprised to hear that some people didn't like this post, LOL!
    ReplyDelete
  18. Some people didn't like it? Really? I suppose depending on what your viewpoint is it could sound like you're heading down the slippery slope of irreversible relativism. Funny how different the actual experience is to me. Actually makes more room for God instead of it all being about how stinkin' right I've got it and the massive amounts of fear that go along with all that :)
    ReplyDelete
  19. I think that all of my life I have wanted to fit in somewhere. There have been times and places where that has happened. But when it comes to the spiritual life, there are so many subjective measurements we lay on things, and they're all slightly different for everyone of us. Compounding matters is the fact that the spiritual life touches us at a core level, so when someone challenges another person's spirituality, it cuts to the quick. Emotions are easily inflamed.

    Missional. I never quite "got" that movement. It seemed to belong largely to the more charismatic side of the house, just like the house-church movement. I tended to gravitate toward the emergent corner. And once in that corner, then I had to find my niche. That chair was too small, and that one was too theological and intellectual. But this one over here was "just right"!

    Then I realized that there really wasn't anyone to fellowship with because my chair was way off in this corner. Of course, I insisted that if I was to have integrity, I needed to stay near my chair.

    I love the way you have articulated the issues. It helps me to better see what I have been doing, and why it has not been satisfying, even though there was so much about it that felt right intellectually. Relationally, it wasn't working.

    I think in the past month I've been wandering in the direction you have expressed. Thanks for clarifying things in a way that gives me much food for thought.

    Blessings be with thee.
    ReplyDelete
  20. Sue - I think it's like this...I love the idea of "missional" as a verb. It describes going and doing and being something.

    I'm sick to death of "missional" as an adjective, as a club or a title or a label. It becomes a program, a measuring stick and a theoretical monster.
    ReplyDelete
  21. I absolutely understand your need to "fit" Gary. I never felt a spiritual shoe my size until I met the emerging streams of faith. But even emerging/ent has become a program or a club people want to belong to. I don't think religion ought to be that way. It's no different than denominationalism. Jesus didn't come to make a new religion, he came to tell us all the religions were wrong, it's the way of Love that he brought. But as humans we have to have our boxes that outline what something should be/should not be or we don't know what to do with ourselves.

    I know some people don't like me saying that. Then again, I'm not really a valid voice because I don't go to church and I'm not labeling myself as missional and I'm just a spiritual nobody. So why should anyone care what I have to say on the subject? Yet, they do.
    ReplyDelete
  22. Why do people listen to you? Because you are honest, analytical, insightful, and articulate. and the pink hair, of course.
    ReplyDelete
  23. I'm with Gary. You are all of those things, so your words carry the corresponding weight, you know?

    Sigh. I wonder why it is that Christians seem so unbelievably fragile in their positions. Imagine a Body that was so crazily, ridiculously, widely divergent in its beliefs that you could NEVER have consensus on who is seeing right.

    Which is what we have. Imagine that Body nevertheless having a spirit of inclusion, so that those things within itself that it just cannot understnad it nevertheless believes are necessary in some way, even if it's just counterbalancing. How awesome would it be to know that on some basic level we all accepted each other even though we will never ever ever EVER agree with each other?
    ReplyDelete
  24. Thanks Gary. Sometimes I wonder...does pink hair somehow automatically make me a bimbo? Because it would seem that way some days.
    ReplyDelete
  25. I think you nailed it Sue. While I will never ever look the other way from spiritually abusive situations, I am learning to see that what doesn't work for me isn't necessarily wrong for everyone. There is value in accepting that which is different and learning to co-live and co-faith with it. But it's hard for us all: conservative/traditional and those who are not so much.
    ReplyDelete
  26. I love your treatment of the idea of labels. I fight myself on this issue because I hate to be labeled or boxed in in any way and yet my mind wants to define things and that can be (is?)the same thing. My heart is to be life giving to all in my sphere, and express Jesus in this earth and to allow others the freedom they need to pursue their journey.
    I prefer using verbs instead of nouns.
    ReplyDelete
  27. Thanks Ann. Sorry I didn't get to your comment sooner...just haven't.

    I completely agree with you. I love how you summed it up as wanting to be life-giving at all times. That's a wonderful way to emphasize the verbs. Thank you.
    ReplyDelete