I'm writing this post for Blog Action Day. Thousands of bloggers all around the world will be writing on the subject of poverty. I know October 15th is nearly over for some of you, but here it's only 6 AM, so I'm not tardy.
Please know, first and foremost, this post is not a criticism of any individual or even of any particular church, but rather a criticism of a
mentality.
About two weeks ago, several local churches were the subject of an article in the local newspaper about how giving was down in area churches because of the economy. One of those churches is our ex-church. You can read the entire article
HERE, but here's an excerpt:
"Standing before his flock, armed with a flip pad and a thick black marker, Jason Albelo, the young jeans-wearing pastor of Gresham's East Hill Church, drew pictures to explain.
"Why the church laid off four workers, including half its youth ministry staff, over the summer. Why Albelo's own father, an East Hill pastor, was taking early retirement. Why the church was closing one of its worship venues and shutting off financial support for a ministers' college."
You might already know that I am not a proponent of any church having oodles of paid staff to begin with, but even more so, I'm not a proponent of a church laying off staff; I think they should be the LAST thing to go, even after the lights go out, in a financially difficult time. I know laying off staff seems like a good business decision, however, this is not a business, this is a church.
So here's problem number one: this church is trying to make a $5.6 million dollar budget balance. They state in the above mentioned article that they are attempting to make up a $400,000 shortfall. All I can think is, with $5.2 million dollars, they can't make up the salaries of four staff members from some
other cuts? Seriously? Now, I will say that I have no knowledge of how said staff members feel about losing their jobs. I hope and pray they are happy about it; maybe God has called them on to something else, provided a new opportunity. However, that's not my point; it's the principle of the thing.
So hold that thought for just a minute.
On another note, we have a ministry like HomePDX. If you have read here very long, you have heard me talk about it. The short version is this: HomePDX is a partner ministry with a church called
The Bridge. Ken Loyd runs Home for "people who live outdoors," in downtown Portland. Each Sunday, Ken and his team feed these people, his friends. They also provide socks, hand warmers, toiletries, sweatshirts and other items to these people. If you want to know more about this ministry, go to the nav bar at the very tiptop of this page and search HomePDX (no spaces). Or you can do the same at
Pam's site. Or better yet, visit their website, linked above.I happen to know, simply because my friends Pam and Donna have been involved with HomePDX from it's inception, that this ministry runs on an extraordinarily meager budget. Here Ken is trying to make the lives of real people better, and yet he gets very little support from area churches. Or should I say, there are a few churches who offer a great deal of support; there are many, many other area churches who offer none.
So back to the issue at hand, and this is where the benefit of the doubt ends, in my opinion. Here I will tell you the reason I cried for over an hour and was entirely hysterical the other night when I originally began writing this post. My husband (don't ask me why) happens to still be on the e-mail list of our ex-church. The other day, he receives an e-mail from this church; if you would like to read the entire message, e-mail me, otherwise, let me quote:
"The completion of Kid City marks the end of Phase I of the Shared Family Experience. Phase II, if you recall, is the redesign of our Early Childhood area and the design work for our high school and middle school environments to match them to the irreducible minimums that we have created for each area.
"To date we have received about $100,000 toward Phase II. That means that we still have about $200,000 more to go. Let me encourage you to join Nikki and me in moving in the opposite spirit and stretching out in this difficult season. Join us in giving beyond the tithe so that we can continue reach future generations"
To clarify, they are
remodeling. To the tune of
hundreds of thousands of dollars (who knows how much the completed Phase I already cost). I will also add that to the best of my knowledge, it has been 15 years or less since those areas were remodeled. We're not looking at 100-year-old spaces with asbestos tile and fire-hazard wiring. Maybe the carpet is stained, maybe the walls need paint; they simply don't meet the church's current vision of their image. Yet, they are laying off staff in these "hard" times. Need I say more?
As well, a ministry such as HomePDX struggles and scrapes to meet the needs of people who live outdoors. I have no knowledge of whether or not our ex-church has ever contributed to HomePDX, but I would venture a guess they have not. They may have other ministries to the homeless or poor that they fund on some level, but I still can't help but wonder how many people who live outdoors' lives could be bettered (and how many of those staff members could have kept their jobs) if there was no remodeling project going on at this church, or even if it was scaled back substantially.
Let me ask this: should any church, anywhere, ever embark on a remodeling or building project when there are hungry and homeless people in their city? Ever? Should churches meet the building improvement needs of their congregation before they meet the needs of children without winter coats, who live in cars, and only eat because the schools provide free breakfast and lunch to them? Should having state of the art whatnot be more important, under any circumstances, than people who have nowhere to live? And then, should jobs be cut to facilitate the funding of this remodel?
What ever happened to compassion? Are we really, as humanity, that greedy? Do we really that adamantly insist that our churches be so nice inside that we will contribute to this project even when staff is being laid off? Even when people go hungry?
This example is only one of thousands of similar situations, all over the world, but because it is close to home, it's the one I choose to point my finger at. The individuals who are named in the quotes in this post are people I have known personally in the past, and they are goodhearted and kind people. I don't for one moment suggest it is any single individual's fault that these things happen, or his responsibility to fix it. We know, especially in a large church, that a Pastor does not function autonomously; there are many, many people who contribute to such thinking. So I want to be clear about this disclaimer: I lay blame not on the leadership of the church, but on all of the members who perpetuate such thinking.
The people who will give to a building fund rather than a "keep the staff" fund.
The people who so easily dismiss staff members who have small children to support, and whose jobs could be saved if it was not for remodeling.
The people who say the facilities seem run down and who say that a remodel will draw more people who need to be saved.
The people who go to church every Sunday, in their nice heated, state of the art building, without a single thought about the people, right in their own neighborhood, maybe even members of their own church, whose children shiver at the bus stop at dawn because they can't afford a coat, hungry because there's nothing to eat at home, tired because they slept in a car.
We are all responsible for poverty, and we have to do better than this.