
There's this guy called Ken Loyd. He's belongs to the chick who Pastors The Bridge. They planted it together, but now he is off into a new thing called HomePDX. He hangs with people-without-houses, because they are his friends. I've written about Ken and HomePDX before.
My friend Pam loves Ken for what he's doing, and she writes about him frequently. Most recently she wrote about him in the February Porpoise Diving Life. If you want to know more about Ken's ministry, just go to Pam's blog and type "Loyd" in the search box in the top left corner.
Another recent interview with Ken was done by Karlene Clark, published at Off-the-Map's Justice and Compassion blog. I'm going to quote from that interview further on.
So now I'm going to shift gears for a minute; we'll get back to Ken.
In Christianity we have labels. In the "emerging" church we have missional, incarnational, holistic, monastic, postmodern, post-this or -that. Early on in my season of detox, I was eager to grab on to something, anything, that wasn't "evangelical", and so I labeled myself as emerging, postmodern, missional, etc. However, as time has gone on, I have almost entirely ceased identifying myself as anything, even "Christian", very often.
Spiritual labels don't work; at least in my perception. They only serve to define a perceived normative behavior for some form of Christian living, a behavior that might not be appropriate or normative for everyone who otherwise relates to said label. Oftentimes, labels also describe a pattern of action which will work in one give situation, a pattern people try to copy into other situations with less success...and it becomes a formula for something.
Take "missional" for example. I thoroughly relate to an account Jonathan Brink shared of an encounter he had over the weekend at the New Conspirators conference:
So back to Ken. I'm not sure what his label would be, but you can be sure he doesn't want one. I hope he never has one, other than "friend", maybe. But if Ken had a label, it might be "purposeless".
In the previously mentioned interview of Ken by Karlene, he says this:
However, I do hope and pray that we don't see a book on the shelves one day soon; a formula based on Ken's ministry titled:
Because that would negate the whole concept. Don't you think?
My friend Pam loves Ken for what he's doing, and she writes about him frequently. Most recently she wrote about him in the February Porpoise Diving Life. If you want to know more about Ken's ministry, just go to Pam's blog and type "Loyd" in the search box in the top left corner.
Another recent interview with Ken was done by Karlene Clark, published at Off-the-Map's Justice and Compassion blog. I'm going to quote from that interview further on.
So now I'm going to shift gears for a minute; we'll get back to Ken.
In Christianity we have labels. In the "emerging" church we have missional, incarnational, holistic, monastic, postmodern, post-this or -that. Early on in my season of detox, I was eager to grab on to something, anything, that wasn't "evangelical", and so I labeled myself as emerging, postmodern, missional, etc. However, as time has gone on, I have almost entirely ceased identifying myself as anything, even "Christian", very often.
Spiritual labels don't work; at least in my perception. They only serve to define a perceived normative behavior for some form of Christian living, a behavior that might not be appropriate or normative for everyone who otherwise relates to said label. Oftentimes, labels also describe a pattern of action which will work in one give situation, a pattern people try to copy into other situations with less success...and it becomes a formula for something.
Take "missional" for example. I thoroughly relate to an account Jonathan Brink shared of an encounter he had over the weekend at the New Conspirators conference:
"I was privy to a conversation with a guy who was really struggling with the weight of so many issues. He was worrying about the war in Iraq, the election of our President, the cost of his job, reaching the poor....His desire to be missional was literally leading him to despair. And to a certain extent I could feel his weight. The tension was clearly evident."I relate to the heart of "missional", however, my life doesn't look very much like people describe "missional" to be. Translated for my own life: how can I, suburban middle-class housewife, compete with the Shane Claiborne's of the world? That's not a slam, not in the least; instead, that's a heart-cry. I have suffered with increasing "missional guilt", and haven't understood how to overcome it. I have this idea in my head, based on the conversation, of what "missional" is supposed to look like, and I end up feeling bad because I'm not it. For instance, I truly and completely understand and support Julie's desire to find a "justice bra". However, what happens next is that I end up wondering, well, if I don't have a "justice bra", does that make me less of a missional person? Again, not meaning anything negative about Julie's search, but about how I perceive myself because of it.
"I’ve often thought of throwing it all to the wind and serving as a missionary in a war torn country. I’ve actually looked into work for NGO’s and positions at the UN. But ultimately I didn’t feel called. And as I stood there listening to my friend, I began to wonder if Jesus was somehow taking a weight from us when he said, “Love your neighbor.” What if we needed the reminder that we’re not called to solve every problem. We can’t. He’s simply asking us to love right where we’re at, to bring love to those we are already in relationship with."
So back to Ken. I'm not sure what his label would be, but you can be sure he doesn't want one. I hope he never has one, other than "friend", maybe. But if Ken had a label, it might be "purposeless".
In the previously mentioned interview of Ken by Karlene, he says this:
"Don’t move to Madagascar to save the lost. Don’t let your body be burned for the gospel (is “Gospel” supposed to be capitalized?). Don’t sell your house and car and stock portfolio to give to the poor. Don’t do anything spectacular. Do mostly nothing special for and with somebody that nobody else wants till you’re dead. Someone else will take it from there."I fully embrace every bit of the heart behind that statement. That's what I want missional, incarnational, emerging to be for me. I can't move to New Guinea and live in a hut. I can't sell my house and start a homeless shelter. For me in my life, doing those things now would be to the detriment of my first mission field: my family. That isn't to say I will NEVER do those things, but not now. However, right now, I can do mostly nothing special, especially with people who might not have very many other people who love them, and I can be damn good at it. Nothing is easy, it's flexible, and it isn't a formula.
However, I do hope and pray that we don't see a book on the shelves one day soon; a formula based on Ken's ministry titled:
"The Purposeless Driven Life"
Because that would negate the whole concept. Don't you think?
27 comments:
I remember Pam's PDL article about Ken Loyd. It was well worth reading, and the guy sounds incredible in his own right.
I totally agree with what you're saying here, too.
i'm so glad you wrote on this erin. The Purposeless Life. Perfect. This is worth unpacking and exploring in thought and conversation further. The drive for significance coupled with the American dream to Be Somebody and the evangelical tendency to Do Great Things for God sets most of us up for disillusionment and the "I must suck" trap.
At the same time I'm not suggesting that we are to be content with mediocrity, whatever that means. But I think you are on to something, and so is Ken, and so am I and Bill Dahl and a remnant of others who are saying, Hold up, quiet simple living is not a mediocre cop-out.
This is the book I would like to write, I MATTER, memoir of a purposeless life....
{hug}
miss you my friend. i called you from the bus stop yesterday because i just had a sneaker wave of grief about janene. i saw a minivan just like hers when i was driving to pick up the kids and just lost it. i needed a familiar human voice to distract me off the ledge. i know i could have acknowledged that with you, but i just wanted to get away from it, not talk about it. so thanks for answering the phone, and thanks for being my friend.
{BIG BEAR HUG}
seithman, thanks. i'm glad you read and connected to ken in my article. he is one of my heroes. for real. for a guy who does nothing special he sure is inspiring me to be a better person...
erin- thank you so much for writing this. i've been trying to figure out how to say it without sounding angry or bitter or selfish. you did a superb job. i'm likely to plagiarize. ;-)
Babe, you KNOW I am right here with you. I hate all of those labels. I don't class myself as emergent or anything else ... why do we have to so quickly shove labels on things and slap the title of a "movement" on everything? It drives me batty.
Sometimes I wonder too about our motives. How much of what we do is because we secretly think if we don't do something that God is gonna send us to hell or be angry with us, or whatever? Maybe he's not asking us to do anything. Maybe we need to learn to rest in him and his love and nothing else before we can get sent out ... and we don't seem to do such a good job of that.
Anywya, sorry to wax despondent. Labels just really jack me off, you know?
Thanks Jarred. Ken is definitely an exception. I think he might be the first pastoral type I've known who has no agenda and nothing in it for himself. Pretty cool.
Pam - You're right, purposeless does not equal apathy. I love the ways you have approached the subject...yes, write a book!
And you're very welcome.
Cindy - I'm so glad it spoke to you. It is a difficult subject to broach. When I wrote this I was so afraid people would misunderstand, but so far they seem to have "got" it.
Sue - Heh! You are much more direct about it, but I agree with you. As soon as something is successful or popular, it gets a label. As soon as there a label, there are standards...then we have to live up to those standards if we want to claim the label. It's sad.
When people ask my label, I say I am a servant. When pressed, a servant of God. I will never define that, so as to create an expectation behind it. I like it that way.
Also, through my journey, I have found only two directives that cover everything. Love God, Love your neighbor. That's it. If we are doing those, I think we're good. And we can do those two, anywhere, at any time.
Lastly, please do not believe ever, that we have to DO something to gain approval, God already loves us. So feeling guilty that we are not like so and so, isn't really necessary. Plus, just remember Jonah, if God wants you somewhere, He WILL get you there somehow.
More like a sledgehammer, some would say.
What is difficult about the label, too, is the boundary it sets. "I'm a left-wing voter so therefore I can't have any right-wing ideas" etc. "Im emergent so what's that Calvinistic thought doing in there?" But all of those distinctions are only in a Western obsession with classifying everything so our own heads don't explode off into the ether.
What happens if the truth we are seeking contains 37% left-wing idea and 63% right-wing but we discount it because it's in an area we disagree with? It just turns us into rigid thinkers, methinks
Nate - I have almost entirely ceased wanting to call myself a Christian. There is so much baggage in that, and I feel no peace when I identify myself that way because the label has been so abused in my life. I definitely think "servant" is better.
I have been saying lately "Love God, Love others, follow The Carpenter." That's all there is to it.
You know, it's so funny, Sue. I was just thinking the same thing the other day...how choosing, say, political affiliation for instance, seems to put us in a box. Overall, I tend to side with one political party, but don't agree with everything on their agenda. I think that's true of most people.
Same with religion. I don't agree with everything that ANY stream of Christianity believes, and I believe some things that most Christians would say is heresy. I'm sort of lost in spiritual never-never land and I like it there.
It's actually a very modern way of thinking to put things in neat little boxes. Life isn't that simple.
Very interesting discussion philosophically from my language-junkie point of view. All words are merely labels, if you get right down to it, and none of our human language is adequate. Of course if comes with baggage--it has to. As people discuss and use words, they accrete meaning--and we have to have some way to communicate meaning and talk about things. We need words as handles to interact with the world and each other.
I've never much liked being named "Sara." It's not that I don't like the name itself, per se--it's that it seems that approximately 1/3 of all Gen-X women are named Sara or Sarah. So the name has never felt like mine. I desire something that means me in a way that a name I share with so many other women who are so unlike me cannot. Yet I have no desire to legally change my name either--this is what I've got. I can't reinvent myself in a vaccuum. This is what my friends and family know me as. This is the handle that I've built my life around. It would be an awful lot of hassle to change all that . . . besides the fact that it would hurt my mother, which I do not want to do. She chosen this name for her daughter years before it was popular because she loved the name and wanted to give me what she loved.
Can it be sort of the same way with "Christian?" Sure it carries a lot of baggage. Sure it's associated with a lot of people who have abused it. But etymologically, it is "Christ-follower," which is exactly what I am. And besides, if all the baggage forces me to confront the fact that I do this Christ following thing not by myself, but together with a whole bunch of people who I would rather have nothing to do with--and that God loves them as much as me--is that necessarily a bad thing?
Hey Erin!!
It was fun having lunch talking about this stuff a bit with you. You think some pretty deep thoughts and I appreciate you sharing them with us!! You know I'm not much for spending a ton of time shifting thru ideas or programs so it was easy for me to latch onto the idea of serving and loving others as those are things I can DO. To breath deep and know that I'm connected with my Creator and loving others as I love myself is all that's required of me in the process is pretty freeing.
I still find it interesting that you are toying with the idea of a "purposeless life" and I've been exposed to think more of intentionality...I do think they are tied together and for the "purposeless" life you are referring to to be effective there has to be some intentionality driving it.
Love YOU!!!
I don't think a book like that would negate anything cuz who are we to presume that we KNOW what the purpose is anyway (short of love?) Wasn't it Mother Teresa who said something like Ken Loyd's? "We're not called to do great deeds but to do small deeds with great love." (or something like that.) I came to your blog via Pam's and really appreciate your thoughtful comments. Please drop by mine sometime (http://losingtheway.blogspot.com) I was in a fundamentalist cult for fifteen years and talk about a purposeless driven life which we thought was The Most Purposeful. It was intense! anyway, glad you're out here. I look forward to reading more. blessings, kristen
okay so the long comment I typed got eaten, lets see what happens now...
I think the learning to serve where we are called is a huge lesson we all need to learn. I will never be Shane Claiborne or discover how to be utterly ethical in my every action. that is so not the point and neither is to feel guilty because of that. Finding that balance between being pushed out of my comfort zone and being true to myself as a believer is an ongoing process.
Sara - I do get what you're saying...but I wonder...if 3/4 of the people you met had negative preconceived notions about you simply because your name is Sara, if you would be inclined to, say, start using your middle name?
I do understand about "Christian" being a birthright of sorts...it's just so hard in the world to escape the preconceptions of the people around us, the people who we want to reach. But you're right in that every term becomes a label...I don't know how to resolve that.
Donna - I thought it was funny that we were going different directions in terms of our understanding of how "purpose" fits into "leading".
But I can be purposeful in being purposeless, right?
Welcome Kristin. Nice to meet you!
I think I wouldn't like to see a book on the subject because it's not really that complicated. I've heard that quote by Mother Theresa, that too is simple. It can't be turned into a 12 step formula to success, if you know what I mean.
Julie - I know. It's so hard to come out of a lifetime of being indoctrinated that there is a "right" way to do everything, or a specific set of actions that go with a purpose (or a label).
That still translates in my life into, "Well, if I'm "missional" I ought to be doing what other missional folks are doing". I need to realize that my purpose isn't your purpose and vice-versa, even if we hold to similar values. But it is hard to unravel that...to learn that my purpose is right where God puts me.
Sorry Blogger ate your comment...which is one of the reasons I'm considering switching. It's become too unstable.
Hey everybody, I HAVE THE ANSWER TO ALL THIS!!!! It comes from an Off The Map interview in the Justice and Compassion section:
"What are your hopes and dreams for the future of HOME?
What we have learned about loving the people nobody else wants will spread to the church and then the world. All will be saved and come to the glorious knowledge of the Ken Loyd method of doing mostly nothing special (I’ll write the book)." Zondervan $24.95 (autographed: $99.50)
Thanks to each of you towards me in your kind comments. Mostly I feel unworthy of praise because I have yellow teeth (actually, a rich amber achieved by decades of overindulgence in red wine, coffee and cigarettes) and a plethora of really nasty personal failings.
It is truly heartening to find so many who care about those who have less (less money, housing, love, employment; whatever) than we do. Thank you.
Love,
Ken
Hey Ken! Thanks for stopping by. Can I get an advance copy of that for review? ;-)
What you do and the way you inspire reeks of Jesus...that's why we are drawn to it. No formula or label, just Love. That's just so cool.
I'm so thankful Pam and Donna have helped me know more about your mission.
Erin
The first proof is yours but it must go in the twenty-five cent (NOT the free) box at your next garage sale.
HEY, our website is up: Google Homepdx.org...clck on "ERROR. PAGE CANNOT" what pops up next is us.
Josh Clark is doing an amazing job of capturing us (the foul language is mine). Origencreatives.com is his website
Killer! Yay! HomePDX has a link of their own, so now I don't always have to link to Pam or Donna when I talk about you!
Nice site, by the way.
How refreshing and real! Perhaps if we all focused on the "one thing" principle of scripture in as transparent a manner as this article and its author has done ... just perhaps, we might get back to NT power and presence in this modern, complicated, plural-panting world in which we live.
May your tribe increase and consider me a wanna-be member who honestly joins your struggle.
Dan
Thanks DrDan. I agree. I wish we could all learn to make it this simple.
Post a Comment