HOME   *   ABOUT   *   CONTACT

KEY POSTS   *   FRIENDS   *   LINKS  

5.30.2007

It's a Wrap!



Well, pending Bill Dahl's approval and barring any last-minute issues, the June PDL is wrapping up. It has been a whirlwind for sure, but we've learned a lot - especially about collaborating. Good thing Pam and I get along well - or all that late night work would have taken a toll on our tempers. We have talked on several occasions about working together on a book someday, so this might be just the beginning!

We have had an amazing time - so many submissions we were stunned. What these women were able to crank out on such short notice... they should all be proud of what they accomplished! I made some new friends and had some interesting conversations. Most importantly, I think we heard some really significant issues and ideas and we're hopeful that people will listen.

I can't tell you anything more yet, but I will say we've added a little something new and hopefully it will work out well. Be sure to keep checking back here as I will let you know when we go live.

One recommendation - we used Google Docs for all our collaborative efforts, and it made everything so much easier. We were able to store all the documents online so we both could access them anytime, and we could make changes and edit a document at the same time, in real time. It made keeping track of what's going on a breeze. Google also stores revisions, so it's good to be able to go back if we change our mind about something. Just waiting for Big Brother G. to get Chat up and running in Docs.

Anyhow - that's about all my brain can crank out this evening.

Thanks for your patience with me on this blog, and thanks to everyone who helped put the word out or sent in submissions.

5.28.2007

Shhhh...It's a Secret


[Edit: Just found out my header renders bad in Internet Explorer. Sorry - I'll fix it as soon as I have time. But if you're not using Firefox yet, I don't feel sorry for you. HeHe.]


I changed something interesting about this blog - can anyone figure it out? Hint: it's not obvious.

No, it's not that I'm using my real name now, although that is rather new.

And no, it's not my pretty new header that my awesome hubby made for me.

There is something else.



In other news... been very busy with the PDL project - sorry I've been so absent. We should be wrapping that up in a day or two now, so I will be back soon after.

5.23.2007

Re:Lost



Man, that just sucks!! Sorry, just expressing my displeasure at some of tonights developments.


Oh, well...here's to 36 weeks and counting.


Over and out.

5.22.2007

Moving Right Along



Yay! The submissions are beginning to trickle in - and my deep and utmost thanks to everyone who has agreed to write for PDL; I look forward to learning from all of you. I also appreciate the advertising so many of you have done for this production.

I've been writing and editing big time in my private world, preparing for PDL, so things might be a little lean around the blogstead for another week or so. Of course, my counterpart has managed to somehow find time to write engaging blog posts in the midst of all this hubbub; I'm afraid at the moment my best attempt is going to be rather feeble.

Today I had a writer tell me she was struggling with the length of her article, and my response was, "Me too!". My own piece for PDL began as almost 2000 words (ugh!), however, I have finally managed to whittle it down to under 1000. I am thankful I don't have any word-count limits on this blog - I'd be in a world of hurt.

It's interesting to me, though, how much the act of editing is like the journey my faith has taken over the last two years. I used to feel as though Christianity was bloatware, full of unnecessary and inefficient functionality. For many years, every sermon, every scripture, every prayer seemed to add unachievable expectations and certain failures to my spirit, and I nearly suffocated beneath the darkness and despair.

With a good deal of editing, a faith has now emerged which is now lightweight and full of life. It has been pruned and pared of fruitless branches. It has become something that is a joy to pass on to others, rather than feeling as though I am inviting people into a life of earthly toil and trouble.

Some people may dislike my oversimplifications, as if it is irreverent, taking something significant away from the holiness of Jesus. It seems a common perception is that our faith must be heavy and burdensome, deep and contemplative, or else it's not sufficiently pious. If that works for you, awesome! I guess I exhaust too easily.

A simple faith is just that. Simple. I don't need creeds and platitudes to know what believe, neither theology nor exegesis to ensure the correctness of my doctrine. For some of you, those claims could seem offensive. That is not my intent, please forgive me. However, looking at my article today, after it has been freed from almost half its birth-weight, I see purpose and message so much more clearly.

Is it so wrong for my faith to follow suit?


5.18.2007

PDL


EDIT: I have heard some ladies are having some trouble finding our submission e-mail addresses - it seems on a couple of occasions in the copying and pasting of our theme, our e-mail links did not properly translate.

Submissions may be sent to:
erinword at gmail dot com
pamhogeweide at gmail dot com


EDIT:
OK, here's the scoop! If you are a woman and you read this blog, consider yourself invited. Also consider your friends to be invited, anyone you know. If I haven't e-mailed you the specifics about it, it's probably only because I couldn't find an e-mail address for you. Feel free to submit something! If you're a guy who reads this blog, feel free to spread the word!

************

Women are emerging from the shadows of ministry, busting through the stained-glass ceiling and taking a sledgehammer to old stereotypes. Here's a chance for you to have a voice - would you like to be heard?

Our theme for this issue: "Progress: Faith in a Dress"

Deadline: This project landed in our laps on Friday, May 18th, and all submissions must reach us by midnight pacific time Monday, May 28 for consideration. A short deadline, yes, but you can do it!

What we are looking for: Submissions from emerging and missional Christian women. Free, out-of-the-box thinkers. Alternative expressions of faith. Wild and crazy, postmodern approaches to theology. Church misfits. Women on the edge. Stained-glass-ceiling rule-breakers. Diverse perspectives are entirely welcome! If you identify with any of those statements, we want to hear from you! Poetry, prose, fiction...you name it, we'll read it. We also are looking for book and music reviews, if that is more your style.

Anything you submit must be your own original work: It may have been published elsewhere (like on your blog, for instance) and we will still consider it, as long as it is not under copyright. There are no strict word-count parameters; we are aiming for a maximum of 1000 words. We also ask that all submissions be written by women and in English.

Here are some ideas to start with: these are not meant to be strictly adhered to, only to help get you thinking - any other ideas you have are quite welcome. Also, some of the questions refer to your "ministry". The word "ministry" here is whatever it means to you: your home, your family and friends, your workplace, your neighborhood, your church, the homeless, pagans, minorities, foreigners...however you see it to be in your life.

  • Can women lead men?
  • Are women effective leaders and thinkers in the body of Christ?
  • What is the place for social minorities in Christianity?
  • What does emerging or missional work look like in your life?
  • How do you see gender equality in matters of faith?
  • What do you see as the primary role of the Church?
  • What do you think are the biggest misconceptions about women in ministry?
  • What are the greatest gifts women bring to ministry?
  • Who are some of your emerging/missional women heroes?
  • How do you perceive your mission field and how do you reach it?
  • What have some of your struggles been as a woman of faith?
  • How do you see women in ministry changing over the next 25 years?
  • How has your expression of or role in the church changed or grown in the last 5 years?
  • How has your theology changed in the last 5 years?
  • Please include with each submission: the title of your submission as you would like it to appear, your full name, e-mail address, and blog or website url (if applicable). Please also indicate to us if you would like your e-mail address and/or url to be published with your submission. This is an opt-in only: if you don't specifically tell us to include your e-mail or url in the publication, we won't.

    One more thing: we are compiling a list of books, blogs and resources which support the concept of gender equality and in support of women in all levels of Christian leadership and ministry. If you have any ideas, be sure to pass them along!

    Thanks so much!

    Pam Hogeweide

    Erin Word


    ******************************

    Edit: By the way - even if you aren't interested ... be sure to spread the word! We want to hear from anyone who'd like to submit.

    OK Ladies, here's your chance!

    Pam and I are the guest editors of the June 2007 Porpoise Diving Life - Reality for the Rest of Us - Picking Up Where Purpose Driven Peters Out ezine.

    This issue is going to be written entirely by women and WE NEED YOU!

    The catch? This has just come up today and we're working furiously to pull everything together. Submissions have to be to Pam and I by - well we haven't agreed on date yet, but I'd say May 28th or ASAP (whichever is sooner). That's only 10 days, so get out your pens! We have to have it all together by the 31st.

    We have not penned our specific theme as of yet...but please e-mail us and let us know if you're interested in submitting something and can commit to writing with a short deadline - and we'll let you know the theme the moment we have cemented it. Hopefully sometime tomorrow we'll be able to get back to you on that.

    Submissions can be poetry, prose, and article, a book review, or a cd review - you name it!

    Erin (that's me) : erinword at gmail dot com

    Pam: pamhogeweide at gmail dot com


    GReader



    Anyone use Google Reader?

    I have realized in the last week or so that I'm having a problem with it: some feeds aren't updating. We all know Google only polls the feeds once an hour. That doesn't seem to be the cause of the problem.

    What I'm running into is this: some feeds won't update for days and days, and then one day I'll get all the posts for that feed for the last 5, up to 10, days or so. There are at least 4 feeds which are doing this, and while that is a small percentage of the blogs I read, they are all ones that are high on my "value" list.

    It seems these are all Typepad blogs, although most Typepad blogs are not having this problem. Anyone know anything about how often Typepad pings?

    I have searched the GReader help and discussion with no results.

    Anyone else run into something like this? It's really lame considering that once I'm notified of a new post, it's days old and the discussion has come and gone. If you know what I mean. More than that I have friends who are wondering why I'm not commenting and I don't want to end up seeming to be ignoring someone.

    Any clues? I'm going to post at the help group as soon as I have a chance, but I thought I'd throw this out there.

    Thanks.


    5.17.2007

    Comments


    Hey guys, I just realized I'm a day or two behind on responding to comments. I try to avoid that because it drives me nuts when people don't respond to my comments for days and days (barring a legitimate reason) ... but I just didn't get to it the last few days.

    Forgive me. I'm gonna go catch up now.

    Scratches on My Heart



    I had an interesting conversation with my 7 year old last night. First there are three recent situations with my son which I want to relate. Please forgive the overly simplistic theology to follow, but I was talking to a first grader. Anyhow, I think we can all use a little simple theology now and then.

    1. A couple days ago he had come home from school and said his classmates were calling him "Mrs. Tiggy-Winkle" (from the Beatrix Potter book). He said it made him angry and embarrassed. I asked if he knew why they were calling him that, and he said he had no idea. So after school yesterday, we brought it up with his teacher. She asked him if he remembered a few days ago when he was calling some of his classmates names in an effort to be funny. It seems he was calling them Mommy and Daddy and Sister and Brother, not buttface or anything obviously like that. I'm not sure where that came from, but evidently for some reason he thought it was funny. Anyhow, his classmates decide to call him Mrs. Tiggy-Winkle in response.

    2. Yesterday at school, a classmate was celebrating her birthday and she brought some pencils with pictures and colors on them (you know the kind) to pass out at gifts to her classmates. It was after recess and the students were taking turns at the drinking fountain, then going to pick their pencil (she was letting them choose). So my son was the last one to get a drink (just the way the chips fell) and therefore the last one to get to pick a pencil. He didn't like the one he got, "Everyone else got cooler ones, mom. All I got was stupid babyish Tigger".

    3. Yesterday afternoon, my boys were hanging out with a couple friends, ages 11 and 13. The 11 year old friend had thought it would be funny to take my 7 year olds shoe and toss it at my 11 year old. Then they played keep away with the shoe. Understand that this boy is a really good friend and I know his intentions were simply playful, not mean. But it really upset my 7 year old, he got angry and started kicking his brother, and eventually I had to get involved to settle it.

    Of course, because of his personality (far too much like his mom, I'm afraid) he took these situations quite personally. He's a sensitive chap, and doesn't take humor against him or unfairnesses very well. He tends to let these little hurts accumulate and fester until he's depressed and angry. I know there is a lesson in there for me, but I just can't seem to think what it is ;-)

    Moving right along...

    So....last night, before bed, he started complaining that life wasn't fair. Then he started crying. So I went into his room and tried to get to the bottom of his unhappiness. He was complaining about the incident with the pencils. Between sobs he was doing his "angry voice" about how it wasn't fair and everyone else got a cooler and better pencil, and whining about "Why does this stuff always happen to me!"

    Finally, after he quieted down, we began to talk about it.

    I told him that the things that make us angry or hurt our feelings are like little scratches on our hearts. We can choose to forgive and the scratch will heal, or we can stay angry about it and our scratch won't heal. I explained to him that when we forgive, Jesus says "I know that hurt your heart, but I can make it better for you", and that Jesus is like a band-aid that will help it heal. But if we chose to stay angry, Jesus can't make it better because the scratch will just keep bleeding through the band-aid, and pretty soon our heart will be so covered with scratches that it will hurt all the time. I asked him what he thought would happen to someone who held lots of little scratches in his heart for a long time and didn't let them heal? He shrugged his shoulders, and I said that person would eventually become pretty grouchy. He asked how we let a scratch on our heart heal. I said, "We have to forgive the thing that hurt us."

    I reflected with him about the name-calling. I suggested that if the name Mrs. Tiggy-Winkle embarrassed him, maybe the names he was calling his friends were embarrassing them, too.I asked him if he knew that name-calling, even if it is meant to be funny, is never nice. He said "But I wasn't trying to be mean and they didn't ask me to stop". I asked him if he thought it was OK to do things that would hurt people, but just until they asked him to stop. I asked him if he thought it would be OK if I decided to squirt toothpaste all over him, just until he asked me to stop. He shrugged his shoulders and then said, "I guess not." Then he said he had been trying to be funny, and I said, "Yeah, but when I would squirt toothpaste all over you, I would be doing it to be funny, too. That would be REALLY funny! But do you think I should know that squirting toothpaste all over you would be mean to you?" He nodded.

    I asked if he realized that when he called someone a name, even if he thought it was funny and not mean, it still left a scratch on someone else's heart. I asked him if he wanted to make scratches on other people's hearts, and he said "No."

    Then I asked him if he knew the difference between something someone does on purpose to hurt us and something someone does that hurts us but they didn't mean to hurt us. He shrugged his shoulders again. I asked if he thought the friend who had taken his shoe and was playing keep-away was trying to hurt him, or trying to be funny. He said "Trying to be funny, I guess." I asked if it still hurt his feelings, even though no one was trying to be mean to him. He said "Well, yeah." Breakthrough! I asked him if he thought this was a scratch on his heart, and he said "Yes." So I asked him if he knew what he should do so the scratch would heal, and he said he would have to forgive.

    On a sidenote here, I realize that 2/3 these situations, there really was nothing to forgive. It wasn't as though someone deliberately wronged him. But I believe that when we perceive a hurt, even when it wasn't meant to hurt us, we still have something to forgive.

    Anyhow, so back to the pencils. I asked him if he could think of anyone who might want a Tigger pencil. He thought about it for a moment and then realized we have a 5 year old next door who likes Tigger. I asked if he would feel good to give it to someone who would like it, and he agreed.

    In this story, the point I want to make is simple, for my own benefit as much as anyone else's. There are so many seeming little events in life that leave a scratch on our heart.

    Be sure to forgive the scratches on your heart, or you will turn in to a grouch. And don't leave scratches on other people's hearts whenever you can avoid it.

    "10 Questions for Religious Leaders..."



    ...at Naked Pastor.

    I'm finding this to be an interesting thread.

    Here's an excerpt:
    1. Is it possible for people to gather without there being an agenda? In other words, can people gather without feeling that they need to “go” somewhere as a group?
    2. Is it possible for people to enjoy the community without having a vision statement?
    3. Is it possible for people to stay in community with each other without a set of rules to follow?
    Go read the rest, and the comments if you have time.

    I'm really thinking about my answers to these questions, especially in light of what Gary Means has been talking about lately here and here.

    I feel a little hesitant to weigh in there, so I thought I'd mention it here.


    Welcome to the Jungle


    An article on CNN today, from Coastal Living, brought a flood of memories back for me.

    Way, WAY back, in the summer after I graduated high school, a girlfriend and I had the chance to spend a week on the Big Island of Hawaii. A good friend of ours had moved there from Portland in our Jr. year of high school. He (just a friend, mind you) and his mom had invited my friend and I to stay with them for a week. What a deal! The really amazing thing about this visit was staying with people who lived there enabled us to avoid much of the tourist nonsense and see Hawaii as it really is, as least as much as is possible for a haole.

    Naturally, since I'm clumsy, I managed to fracture my foot the first day we were there. I was determined this wasn't going to put a damper on my week, even though when we went wave jumping, I got tumbled against the sand and my friends thought it was the funniest thing they had ever seen and razzed me about it all week.

    One of my best memories of that week was the day we toured the Waipio Valley, the Vally of the Kings. Our guy friend brought another friend of his, and the four of us went on a jungle adventure, in a Jeep Wrangler with the top off. We played Guns-N-Roses "Welcome to the Jungle" repeatedly on the stereo and more or less suffocated in the 95 degree 95% humidity. We had to drive though rushing water, on the side of a cliff, and over the most bone-jarring road I had ever been on. (This was almost 20 years ago, and I have heard things have improved a bit over the years as tourists get wind of the place.)

    The place left me positively breathless. I remember sitting on a rock next to the river that runs through the valley, on the beach right where that river enters the ocean. You can see the spot in the picture above. It was so very quiet there. It was, and still is, the most incredible and beautiful and stunning landscape I have ever seen. Granted, I haven't traveled a great deal, although with my numerous subsequent trips to the Aloha state and having lived a lifetime in the Pacific Northwest, I consider myself somewhat of an amateur expert on natural beauty.

    CNN says:
    "Standing thigh-deep in a roaring creek, Donnie Mitts wrestles a water-soaked plank. Before last night's downpour, the board served as a bridge over the stream. Today, Mitts fights the powerful current to muscle it back into place. From the creek bank, a cluster of onlookers watches nervously. If he loses his footing, the rushing water will sweep him over a waterfall just a few feet downstream -- leaving the group stranded in the forest without a guide."
    When I think about being in touch with God, I think about this amazing place I visited one single, sweltering afternoon almost two decades ago. I think, how can anyone doubt His existence when there exists in the world places like that? What an incredibly creative and entertaining God!

    I've never been fortunate enough to return to this place, however we are hoping (fingers crossed, barring any financial crises between then and now) to take the kids to Maui next summer to stay in my uncle's condo, and with the inter-island ferry getting fired up this year, maybe we will be able to spend a day or two there.

    If you ever have the chance to visit the Big Island, I would recommend seeing if you can get into a tour of this place. You won't regret it.

    5.16.2007

    I don't know, I don't know, I don't know...


    ... where I'm a gonna go when the volcano blow.


    Over at Metroblogs Portland they are talking about the 27th anniversary of the Mt. St. Helens eruption, which is coming up Friday.

    For those who might not know, Mt. St. Helens is about 100 miles (almost) due north of Portland. Since we are a hilly city, we had a clear vantage point of the May 18, 1980 eruption from almost anywhere in the city.




    I was in elementary school. It's possible that I remember hearing it blow, or feeling the 5.0 quake, but those memories could be figments of my imagination, created by repetitious news footage.



    Although the eruption was in the morning, the ash plume continued all day. My dad was out of town on business, and I remember mom getting KFC and taking the three of us (my youngest brother hadn't come along yet) to Fernhill Park to watch the show. Weird humans that we are, we will watch a catastrophic event like it's a feature film, popcorn and all. Anyhow, Fernhill is at the north edge of the city, and has a big hill facing the north, a great view.



    I don't think I realized the true impact of this event until we saw on the news the footage of the mudslide down the Toutle river, and images of the people in Yakima wearing surgical masks and walking down streets covered in several inches of ash, shoveling sidewalks like it was snow.


    We were very fortunate. Some people had speculated that a major eruption at St. Helens could awaken Mt. Hood, which is about 75 miles east of Portland, and thankfully to this day, remains a dormant volcano.

    Anyhow, this may not seem relevant to my blog, but I assure, you, this event has been a part of my life. I have taken time to impart the knowledge of this to my children, watching the documentaries as they come around this time of year, talking with them about it; just as my parents talked with me about the assassination of JFK, or their parents talked with them about Pearl Harbor; also as my children will talk with my grandchildren about 9/11.

    Why do we sometimes define our lives by the memories of major events? Is it because these events rock our world, forcing us to see things differently, cherish our loved ones even more, value our lives more greatly?

    I don't know, but this is one I will never forget. Here's to the day my little grandchildren or (God willing) great-grandchildren crawl into my lap and ask me to tell them about the day "that volcano blew up".

    5.15.2007

    Climate Change and Suburban Dilemmas


    I guess this turned out to be a long one...



    There is no doubt in my mind that the climate is changing. I've seen the data indicating this. I also have no doubt that we are polluting the environment at an astonishing pace. Both of these things are facts, in my mind.

    However, I want to ask something - this is just something that has been rattling around in my brain for some time. If you know more than I, or if you know I have my information wrong, please let me know.

    Do you think climate change is ultimately caused by pollution, or is it part of the earths natural cycle?

    We know the earth has not maintained a constant temperature over the eons. We also know the earth is far from the warmest it's ever been, even if you're only considering the years of human existence. We do know the earth is overall warmer than it has been in maybe (sources vary) 2000 years. What about before that?

    So I did some digging and found some interesting stuff. Because I've found the most user-friendly diagrams there, I'm going to refer to this page at Wikipdia.

    The earth has temperature cycles. If you consider that we humans have only been really affecting the climate since the beginning of the industrial age, when we began burning coal, we have only impacted the climate for around 300 years. If we look at models spanning those years, why, yes, we do see warming. However, 300 years is really a blink of an eye as the age of the earth goes, and paleoclimatology shows the earth having numerous similar warming cycles long before we humans had anything to do with it.

    I'm all for changes in our lifestyle which have a positive impact on the health of our planet. But who's to say we can do anything about global warming? Is it possible that it's inevitable because our planet was designed to cleanse and purge itself from time to time? We know the earth is alive and ever changing. Maybe we will have to learn to adapt to a warmer climate, even if we do reduce pollution to the best case scenario?

    Anyone want to weigh in?

    On a related note, I hate living in suburbia for exactly this reason - the changes I would like to make in our driving lifestyle are more than impractical, they are virtual imposibilities. Anyone have any ideas for changes we can make when almost nothing is conveniently located in walking distance? We can't even walk to a public library. This is not how I grew up, but Portland has changed.

    We theoretically could sell and move closer in, out of the suburbs, if we were really passionate; but we didn't move into the more urban neighborhoods 9 years ago for the same reason we couldn't now. Portland has become an unapologetically "green and liberal" city, and for the last 15 years or so it's become increasingly desirable to live in the city, within easy walking distance or public transpo to whatever you need. The suburban migration that began in the 40's and 50's has reversed itself and the flow is now back into the city. This is essentially a good thing: we no longer have the urban slums we did even 15 years ago; urban renewal has been a godsend around here. However, we could not buy an urban house, even if substantially smaller and in much poorer condition, for the same price as the current mortgage on our 1970 suburban split-level. Portland is weird this way. I'm not complaining, I love my home, as much as I would like to live closer in. And I love Portland (at least 6 months of the year).

    My dad likes to tell this story (although there is question as to whether or not it's actually true - my dad is a bit of a jokester): He was on a cross-country flight maybe 20 years ago. The guy in the seat next to him began to make small talk, indicating his line of work to be intellectual and his education to be quite high. Eventually the conversation turned to their city of origin. The man gave a long explanation about his various moves around the country. When he asked my dad where he was from, my Dad said, "Portland". The man thought about it for a moment and then said, "Portland, Maine?" "No," said my dad, "Portland, Oregon." The man was thoughtful for another moment, then asked, "I'm sorry, but where is that?". "Oregon", my dad replied, "You know, just north of California". The man still looked perplexed, so my dad finally caved and said "It's kind of like a suburb of Los Angeles".

    I'm afraid, in many ways, we are.

    My husband commutes 50 miles a day, from the far eastern suburbs to the far western ones. He tries to ride his bike as much as he can when the weather is nice; you know how often that his here in Portland. He also tries to take public transportation, however it means a mile to the Max stop from our house, and a mile from the last bus stop on the other side of this city to his work. Reverse the process for the trip home. And, to make it even more complicated, the bus he takes on the last leg of his commute is a commuter-service only, which means it only runs from downtown to Tualatin twice in the AM and twice in the PM. If he misses it, he's in a world of hurt. Yes, theoretically, he could get another job closer to home, but he works in our "family" business, so it's far more complicated than that, even if he wanted to leave. So, much of the time, it's driving both ways in our 80's Volvo. Fortunately it gets excellent gas mileage.

    We use CFL bulbs and recycle as much as we can, loads. I'd love to shop at farmer's markets, but the closest one is 20 minutes by car - doesn't that defeat the purpose? What's the balance between shopping at a big-box grocery that is more expensive and not local but is walking distance from home, or and shopping at a "natural" or "whole" foods store or farmer's market 10 miles away? So I shop close to home, walking whenever the weather permits. I spend more on food, but use less fuel, and it's good for me. We turn off the lights, try to keep the heat down (although I am a little guilty there some days), have energy-efficient appliances. We run the a/c only when it's over 80 (and it would be higher if we didn't have a husky. It really affects his health when it's hot.) Our days of driving to private school are almost over, fortunately, and it will be walking or the bus for the kids from here on out.

    Any suburbanites have any other kinds of suggestions for us? How else can we improve the environment?

    What I Read Yesterday



    Here are some posts and articles I read yesterday:

    ~~ Jordon Cooper starts talking about "Faith". Being a child of the 80's, it truly cracked me up.

    ~~ CNN says even at the time of the Mercury space program there were a number of women pilots who were as fit as the men, but "the world just wasn't ready at that time". I can't help but wonder when the world will finally be really ready for women in ministry without a fight.

    ~~ The Consumerist talks of Starbuck's new program allowing anyone to submit their thoughts for inclusion on a Starbuck's coffee cup. But one woman says she will never drink their coffee again after what she read on her cup:
    "Why in moments of crisis do we ask God for strength and help? As cognitive beings, why would we ask something that may well be a figment of our imaginations for guidance? Why not search inside ourselves for the power to overcome? After all, we are strong enough to cause most of the catastrophes we need to endure." Bill Schell, a Starbucks customer from London, Ontario. He describes himself as a "modern day nobody."
    Michelle Incanno, who is Catholic, says "As someone who loves God, I was so offended by that. I don't think there needs to be religious dialogue on it. I just want coffee. I wouldn't feel right going back."

    What do you think? Are religious comments inappropriate on a Starbuck's coffee cup, or are they a tool for inciting dialog?

    ~~ Yesterday in my comments, Makeesha Fisher mentioned something I had never heard of - a prayer of examen. Out of curiosity, I had to look into it. Here it is explained at Living Room.

    ~~ My friend Gary wrote the other day about his "Dream of a Sanctuary", and since in some ways I share a similar dream, I asked him about evangelism. So he dug up an old post he had written on the subject for me. I should have known he would have already covered it.


    5.14.2007

    How to Pray



    In listening to te GFPWHC podcasts (yes, I'm talking about them a lot), I want to mention one thing Tony Jones said which was interesting to me ... and this isn't verbatim:
    "I'm sick of people who pray to the god of weejus.... (there was a pause as that sank in) ...you know, Dear God, we just... (laughter)."
    He goes on to say something along the lines of this:
    "When you order breakfast, you can't say, 'I'll just have the pancakes. Oh, and I'll just have some eggs'...the word 'just' means only one thing. One thing."
    I am guilty as charged. In the charismatic church, I learned to pray exactly like that: "Lord, we just this, and we just that..." Aside from the fact that it's habitual and downright annoying, it's simply untrue, because we will often pray 'just' a dozen things.

    So I'm working hard to end the "we just" habit.

    We all have prayer habits. I've been working on teaching my 11 year old how to pray more effectively. Until now, he has been stuck in his simple memorized prayer:
    "God bless mommy and daddy and brother and me. Thank you for the great day. Please help us have a great day tomorrow..."
    There are sometimes minor variations, but you get the idea. How we got into this rut is unknown to me, probably somewhere along the line I should have corrected him, but I think this stems from a tired mommy each night at prayer time just wanting to get it over with, back when the kids were smaller and I got less sleep. I'm sorry, just being honest.

    So for about 6 months, we've been talking about conversation in prayer. I asked my son to think about how he would tell me about his day - and then talk to God the same way. I told him to simply tell God what he liked about his day, what he didn't like, what he's worried about, and someone (or something) he'd like to pray for. I certainly have prayed with him by example many times, but it seems he is just now "getting it". He is learning, and it's really cool. He still says his little memorized thing, too, although I think this stems from his obsessive-compulsive nature, afraid that if he doesn't pray "just right", God won't hear him. This is another blog post.

    Do you have a formula, either loose or more specific, for prayer?
    How did you teach your kids to pray?
    How do you think we get stuck in habits like "we just..."?
    Do you think it really matters to God how we pray, as long as we do? (Within reason, I mean.)

    5.11.2007

    Seminary Snobs ... Sheesh. Get over yourself, will ya?



    So I have truly, deeply enjoyed the podcasts from the GFPWHC conference. I have been downright amazed, blessed, encouraged, and on occasion, rendered speechless. (Phil, if you read this, I'm so thankful for and impressed with this event you pulled together. Do it again, for sure, just on the west coast this time. Pretty please?)

    I do have one little thing from the podcasts which I want to comment on.

    I'll be the first to admit I might have pegged this entire situation all wrong, because there is a lot to be said for body language. If so, maybe someone who was actually there can set me straight; I would love to know. I'm also going be somewhat vague, on purpose. If you want to know the details, I recommend you listen to the podcasts.

    So one individual spoke about how it might not be necessary for a Pastor to have a seminary education in order to be effective in ministry. This same person soon made a simple and insignificant error in the pronunciation of a biblical word.

    Later on, another (highly educated) individual made the comment that a number of people likely cringed at said pronunciation error, and maybe in light of that error a seminary education might not be a bad idea after all.

    Um. Okaaaay...

    I was sorely disappointed when this opportunity was taken to be seemingly catty. As the emerging church, we talk ourselves breathless about how important it is to practice Jesus' love accurately rather than to know all the right things. But when we don't know all the right things, we are, um, belittled for it? I believe it is necessary for some people to deeply understand the history, context and theology behind Christianity. It's when these people become Seminary Snobs that I really become irritated. They tire me. Fast.

    OK, I also get that this was a two sided coin, and in some ways you could say the first person started it by dogging on seminary in the first place. However, I heard that first person suggesting to the average Joe that he need not be intimidated by a lack of formal biblical education in order to be effective for Jesus. I heard the second person say if you don't have formal biblical education, you will wind up making a fool of yourself.

    For the record, I don't give a rat's ass how someone pronounces a biblical word, as long as they have the message of Jesus straight. I, for one, tend to be more deeply affected and encouraged by people who walk the Jesus walk (not that I do that well at all) than by people who know the correct pronunciation, transliteration, or T-V-M of fancy ancient words.

    I mean, let's not lose our focus, here.


    Christian as an Adjective?



    So I happened upon this video at GodTube:

    Why GodTube is Stupid


    Some interesting points, but it also raises some interesting questions. My first thought is I have to commend GodTube for allowing this video to remain online, considering how critical it is of them. It has received 120 comments, some agreeing, some disagreeing, but the founders of GodTube even expressed their thoughts about it.

    If you don't want to watch the 4 minute video, let me sum it up.
    "Why do Christians even need their own YouTube?"

    "Christian as an adjective gives whatever you are describing some fictitious approval of God on anything they deem to be 'Christian'. What about all the things that are labelled 'Christian' that totally suck? I don't think God liked His seal of approval on the Left Behind movie."
    He goes on to ask (paraphrase),
    "Why should Christian content be hidden away on a Christian site instead of on YouTube for all the world to see?"
    If you read the comments, you do see the holes in his argument, but it's an interesting discussion. It's really the same old discussion - should we be in the world or out of the world? Should we shelter ourselves from things that might offend us, or should we be willing to interact with differing opinions and views? Is it good for Christians to have a place where they can be certain they won't see anything they would rather not see, or is it unfortunate that we hide this content away from the secular world?

    Question: Do you think using the word 'Christian' is appropriate to describe things other than just people? Christian music, Christian clothing, Christian YouTube? Who determines what is Christian and what isn't? I can say that any person who describes themselves as a Christian is a 'Christ follower', but who's to say what music is Christian? Do the lyrics have to invoke the name of Jesus? Does it have to quote scripture? Do all the band members have to be Christian? What if the music is decidedly secular but the band claims to be Christians?

    How do you define it?

    5.10.2007

    Thank You



    I had in mind a great post today, but it will have to wait. I have been upstaged (as often happens) by two ladies, smarter and wiser than I, who always seem to get my thoughts right when I cannot; it's almost as though they read my mail. I can't help but think about how lucky and blessed I am to have had them to walk with me as I try to recover from the greatest hurt and shock I have ever experienced, which was unfortunately at the hands of the church. I see, in glimpses, how much I share with each of them, even as different as we each are. There is no counting the ways I have learned from them.

    I honestly cannot remember how I first met Grace, back in the summer of 2005 - I think hers was one of the very first blogs I ever ventured to. Today I went back and searched for my very first comment there, hoping I would have said how I found her, as I often do when meeting a new blog. I guess I was having an "off" day, because I didn't. It could very well be that I Googled "spiritual abuse" and "blog" and found her that way. Anyhow, it was reading her blog and commenting there which gave me confidence to eventually start my own, because she was always gracious and friendly and understood what I was talking about. I don't think she knows what an encouragement she was to me in my very first, tentative steps into blogging. Although we live 1200 miles apart, I can't help but hope to someday have a chance to thank her in person. I envy Grace, being endlessly eloquent and gentle and generous in her writing.

    I met Pam through a comment she posted on Grace's blog, I think it was back in January 2006. Pam's comment so interested me that I visited her blog and e-mailed her. I found out she was here in Portland, and after a flurry of e-mails where we quickly determined each other was not an ax murderer, and we met in person. A quick and deep kinship ensued. I am now fortunate to claim Pam as a very good *real life* friend. I envy Pam for being fearless; always willing to say the hard stuff, with her amazingly descriptive writing style.

    Both of these ladies tell it like it is - they are honest and insightful. If you don't already read them, I highly recommend them.

    Today they each had a post that spoke volumes to me.

    Pam talks about disillusionment with the church and herself.
    "Suzanne and I began talking about church and before long I was breaking the promise to myself to not talk about It. “I don’t know what it is,” I feebly explained. “It’s like a restlessness or something. Everything seems wrong with the way we do church, but I don’t know why.”
    And then
    "I would do well to remember that the disillusionment I have wrestled with in regards to organized Christianity and church structure, is foremost a battle with misconceptions about myself. I am the Church. It is me. And if I can't find peace in my own wilderness inside of me then I will not find it outside in others."
    Grace talks about healing and empathy.
    "Sometimes I worry about the fact that I no longer feel the hurt from our encounter with spiritual abuse, that somehow it is my responsibility to continue to carry the pain.

    I wrote the spiritual abuse articles from the midst of my grief. They came from a place that was real and feelings that were raw. I hope that the words from that time have the ability to connect with others who are now in the midst of their own raw and vulnerable situation."
    And
    "Maybe it is a good thing that as others go through this, I am not down in the pit with them. I know their pain, but now I stand as one removed from it, hopefully as proof that there is hope beyond where they are at this time."

    I certainly hope to continue to grow these friendships. Thanks, ladies, for being a friend.

    Jacob? Who the HECK is Jacob?


    (This post for Losties only. )

    I know that's the question millions of people are asking today, in the relatively unscary and peaceful light of dawn.

    Addison Road has posted a screen cap of "Jacob". Yes, apparently (unless I've been taken for a ride on this) there was actually *someone* there for exactly ONE frame.

    Here's the thumbnail, follow the link in the image to the full-size one. Someone over there says he looks like Jack's father, or alternatively, Kris Kristofferson. What do you think?



    5.08.2007

    Prince to Study The King



    ...and we don't mean Harry and Elvis.

    Is the world coming to a freakishly bizarre end?

    According to CNN, Prince intends to take time off after his upcoming 21 nights in London gig.
    "The 48-year-old, who said he was getting his inspiration these days from "prophets from the Bible", added that he did not expect to be back in London performing for some time after the 2007 visit.

    "That's another reason why we're trying to stay so long. I just need to take some time off for study and travel." When asked what he was studying, he replied: "The Bible".

    Whodathunk?


    Where do you live?


    This is where I live. Where do you live?