November 15th Synchroblog: Money and the Church
"Magazinial Outreach"
"Magazinial Outreach"
**About a year ago, I wrote a post as a reaction to the huge quarterly magazine my CLB publishes. If you'd like to read that original post, you can find it HERE. Be aware, there is cussing and tangible bitterness in that one.
My CLB is a megachurch with all the trimmings, including the publication of a 20-30 page full-color quarterly magazine (or at least last time I checked). This magazine was printed in vast quantities and made available for free in the church foyer. For a number of years, I was an eager consumer of said magazine: enjoying the inspiring articles, appreciating the details about programs, ministries and classes, and believing it was an excellent way to inform people of awesome things going on there. In my mind, it was an "outreach".
About a year ago (about two years post-church), my husband went to a service at our CLB and brought home a copy of the current church magazine. My reaction surprised me; I no longer appreciated this publication; instead, I was thoroughly irritated at this behemoth icon of modern consumeristic church, appalled at myself for ever having "subscribed" to it.
I recognized this reaction as a change in my mindset. Suddenly, it represented meals which were not on the plates of children in my community, people being evicted from their homes and the elderly who cannot afford their medications. And I was entirely surprised at the passion and depth of this change in my heart. As in the original post I referenced, this passion involved a great deal of cussing.
My CLB is a megachurch with all the trimmings, including the publication of a 20-30 page full-color quarterly magazine (or at least last time I checked). This magazine was printed in vast quantities and made available for free in the church foyer. For a number of years, I was an eager consumer of said magazine: enjoying the inspiring articles, appreciating the details about programs, ministries and classes, and believing it was an excellent way to inform people of awesome things going on there. In my mind, it was an "outreach".
About a year ago (about two years post-church), my husband went to a service at our CLB and brought home a copy of the current church magazine. My reaction surprised me; I no longer appreciated this publication; instead, I was thoroughly irritated at this behemoth icon of modern consumeristic church, appalled at myself for ever having "subscribed" to it.
I recognized this reaction as a change in my mindset. Suddenly, it represented meals which were not on the plates of children in my community, people being evicted from their homes and the elderly who cannot afford their medications. And I was entirely surprised at the passion and depth of this change in my heart. As in the original post I referenced, this passion involved a great deal of cussing.
Recently there has been talk about a certain megachurch's admission that they may have missed the mark in their creation of attractional programs and outreach. Some reactions to that admission have spoken of the difficulty in changing the ways of a megachurch; or like Amy Grant sings, "It takes a little time to turn the Titanic around". Often, this is used as an excuse not to even try, because it honestly seems impossible to convert an attractional church from its ways. Maybe we emergissional types are to partly blame for that "impossible" attitude. We may seem to desire an instantaneous change in these Titanics; asking far too much as evidence of change.
A few years ago, Readers Digest initiated a "Change One" campaign, aimed at helping people improve their health by simply changing one bad habit at a time. I wonder if the same could be applied to church...rather than demanding systemic change in a megachurch, what if we askde the leadership of these churches to simply change one thing? (At least for now). One suggestion I have is to consider discontinuation of the big honkin' church magazines, dedicating the savings to real-life outreach, rather than "magazinial" outreach.
Assuming a large church might normally spend as much as $15,000 (or more) on a quarterly publication, every three months this magazine possibly equals:
- Help putting food on the tables of 100 families. - or -
- Help for 100 families with their rent/mortgage - or -
- Help with the medical expenses of 100 or more people.
- Or some combination thereof.
I understand an obvious concern with making important information available to people who need it. However, this church has a comprehensive and expensive website where this publication is available for download. Many American churchgoers do have internet access; why not print a small quantity of simple, black-and-white flyers for those who don't? These flyers could contain all the pertinent information, without the bells and whistles such as photos and articles, and this could be done quite inexpensively. Then, simply ask the congregation NOT to take a copy of this flyer if they have internet access.
I understand to some people, even this small step will seem like an impossibility.
To others of us, it might seem like too little, too late.
However, is just "One Thing" really a bad thing? Could we emergissionals learn to recognize small changes, being appreciative of the all the "One Things" some churches are changing? Could we encourage small changes as part of bigger change? Yes, and Yes.
The magazine is simply one example; there are many "One Things" for a large church to choose from.
However, I, for one, no longer believe church magazines are an outreach of any kind.
Thanks for reading.
This post is part of a synchronized blogging event; please visit my fellow synchrobloggers. I will update this list with post links as they become available. If you'd like to participate in this monthly event in the future, e-mail me and I'll hook you up.
Money and Church is the topic. Follow the links, and watch the fur fly!
The Check That Controls at Igneous Quill by Adam Gonnerman
Trusting God: A New Perspective at Eternal Echoes by Sally Coleman
Greed and Bitterness at Square No More by Phil Wyman
But I Gave at Church at The Assembling of the Church by Alan Knox
Moving Out of Jesus Neighborhood at Be the Revolution by David Fisher
Money and the Church: why the big fuss? at Mike's Musings by Mike Bursell
Bullshit at The Agent B Files by Agent B
The Bourgeois Elephant... at Headspace by Lainie Petersen
The Church and Money at Khayna by Steve Hayes
Pushing The Camel at Fenando's Desk by Fernando Gros
Lord, Won't You Buy Me a Mercedes Benz at Hello Said Jenelle by Jenelle D'Alessandro
Walking with the Camels at Calacirian by Sonja Andrews
Money and the Church: A Fulltime Story at The Pursuit by Lew A
Coffee Hour Morality at One Hand Clapping by Julie Clawson
Bling Bling in the Holy of Holies at In Reba's World by Reba Baskett
Money's too tight to mention at Out of the Cocoon by Paul Walker
When the Church Gives at Payneful Memories by Leah
Greed at Hollow Again by Dan Allen
Tithe Schmithe at Discombobula by Sue
Silver and Gold Have We - Oops at Subversive Influence by Brother Maynard
What if We had Nothing by Tim Abbott
Who, or What, Do You Worship at Charis Shalom by Bryan Riley
Zach at Johhny Beloved by Zach Forrest
Wealth Amidst Powers at Theocity by Kirk Bartha
Greed and Bitterness at Square No More by Phil Wyman
But I Gave at Church at The Assembling of the Church by Alan Knox
Moving Out of Jesus Neighborhood at Be the Revolution by David Fisher
Money and the Church: why the big fuss? at Mike's Musings by Mike Bursell
Bullshit at The Agent B Files by Agent B
The Bourgeois Elephant... at Headspace by Lainie Petersen
The Church and Money at Khayna by Steve Hayes
Pushing The Camel at Fenando's Desk by Fernando Gros
Lord, Won't You Buy Me a Mercedes Benz at Hello Said Jenelle by Jenelle D'Alessandro
Walking with the Camels at Calacirian by Sonja Andrews
Money and the Church: A Fulltime Story at The Pursuit by Lew A
Coffee Hour Morality at One Hand Clapping by Julie Clawson
Bling Bling in the Holy of Holies at In Reba's World by Reba Baskett
Money's too tight to mention at Out of the Cocoon by Paul Walker
When the Church Gives at Payneful Memories by Leah
Greed at Hollow Again by Dan Allen
Tithe Schmithe at Discombobula by Sue
Silver and Gold Have We - Oops at Subversive Influence by Brother Maynard
What if We had Nothing by Tim Abbott
Who, or What, Do You Worship at Charis Shalom by Bryan Riley
Zach at Johhny Beloved by Zach Forrest
Wealth Amidst Powers at Theocity by Kirk Bartha
33 comments:
Hey, chieck out the post I have up now about McDonald's church. It talks about consumer packaged church. If it fits with the synchroblog, use it. If not. I got over the waste of the church a while ago.
Hey, going off, dude. Good stuff :)
(This synchroblog thing is fun! - especially now I've finished! It felt like homework for a bit there :)
Yet another great post, Erin. I find your reaction to this quarterly publication as powerful as I find your suggestion of "one step at a time" sensible.
Of course, I have to admit that I think that "outreach programs" tend to miss the mark anyway by the simple fact that they're "programs." But I'm probably straying a bit far from your topic with that one. ;)
great post, erin. the collateral of a church resembles the collateral of a business. of course some of it is necessary and wise to have. i see your point, totally, that thousands of copies of a glossy mag that takes away resources that could otherwise help someone in need. and that's the heart of it, isn't it? how do churches in the west of the 21st century manage our resources in the communities we live in? sobering to think about, especially in light of the recent senate furor over megachurch lavish spending.
So I have to ask...
If the magazine gets canceled what happens to the jobs of all the writers and editors and photographers who get fed off of it? Not to mention how does the money ever come in in the first place without the ad space to sell in a glossy publication?
I enjoyed the 'original' post - well worth a read, I have to say!!!
Nate - Yeah I read that post. Great one. If you want to be on this synchroblog mailing list for the future, shoot me an e-mail.
Sue - Thanks! I'm glad you joined in, it is fun!
Jarred - What, you mean you're life hasn't been changed by church outreach programs? ;-)
Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate you reading my drivel!
Pam - Thanks. You are right. How can big churches manage their resources best? Maybe by helping out smaller churches who have no resources?
Julie - Well in this case it's a magazine produced by existing church staff, with articles and photos submitted by church members, and printing is paid for out of the church's general fund (which is supported by tithes) - there isn't any advertising in it. So I don't think anyone is going to lose their job over it.
But that is a good point, thanks for bringing it up. I maybe should have been clearer about that.
Paul - Thanks very much for reading the original post. I was having an attitude the day I wrote it, but I think if you can get past the attitude, it's a good post.
I could not agree more and think this is an excellent idea. I feel the same way when I see things here where I work that ares so expensive to produce and I wonder WHY? Why are we spending all this money to promote people giving money. I mean seriously, the amount of time, paper, postage, ink, etc. that goes into some of our elaborate "maketking pieces" that I KNOW end up in the trash, makes me nauseous.
We're not a church but we are a ministry so it sort of is the same, I think.
Love your thoughts!
ah, my friend, i know this all too well. the ministry machine at its finest. it makes me crazy. and i have been caught on the other end of it, too, where i thought it was so cool that our church did x or y. now i see it so differently. the consumer church is an industry in and of itself. the waste is unbelievable. i have seen it upclose and personal and to see how much $ gets spend on "show" and how many goes to helping people. yeah, a pretty huge disparity in most church machines. i always say the refuge could fund itself from the money a lot of churches spend on spilled coffee. imagine what we could do with a magazine budget!!
yeah, keep us in the synchroblog loop so i can know what the topics are.
Barbara - I hear ya. I definitly think there are times when a church or ministry needs to release printed materials...but one thing I forgot to mention in my post is this church ALSO puts out a monthly 4-6 page magazine - full color, glossy all that jazz. Talk about redundant media.
But if big churches with huge budgets could find one expense they could quit and dedicate it to helping people, that would be cool.
Kathy - I know you get it ;-)
I see people like you guys and the Bridge really impacting so many people with so minuscule of a budget, and then I see my CLB and churches like it with their 6 million dollar budgets and how little tangible impact is made, and I can't help but wonder. My CLB, in the last budget I saw, spent about 8% (of $6 mil.) on actual outreach - the rest on buildings, programs, salaries and the like. That's not even a tithe. :-0
I know a machine needs to support itself, and many people are dependent on it, and like Julie said, even people's jobs...but I think changing one thing is doable.
Erin: Not particularly no. Unless one or two of them made me more cynical. But I'm sure that wasn't the intended change. ;)
And I hardly consider your thoughts drivel!
Jarred - Thanks for the compliment. I think this is something some of us (Christian types) are learning...we shouldn't create programs or evangelistic styles designed to "save" people - because then (and this drives me nuts) they become a commodity - rather than a person - and Jesus' mandate to us is not really about salvation anyhow, it's about making people's lives better. At least that's my thought on it.
Wow, the original post was pretty amazing.
And, I like this one too.
Very interesting to see where your journey with God has taken you. I also like your suggestions about Just One ... it really resonates with me.
Thanks for clarifying. For some reason today I am in a mood to ask those "but what about...?" questions. :)
Thanks Sonja, it has been interesting. I think one thing is better than nothing, for sure.
Julie - I like your questions...you often bring up things others don't think of. It was a good question.
sorry for being so late. i couldn't agree more with your post. well said.
Thanks Cindy. You're not late...everyone else was early ;-)
yes, good idea to change one bad habbit at a time :)
I vote for two things ;-) The one that got me was when they installed those massive projection screens. They already had two large screens that are easy to see from the back row, but no that wasn't good enough...we "needed" two more screens, reaching nearly floor to ceiling (30 feet tall?). They're so big they give me motion sickness, but if I knew how much they cost I'd be even more sick.
Impress people, or help people?
Y.A.H.
Paul - Thanks.
Randy - Two things even better, but let's not ask too much.
I agree about the screens. I never got that. They are right next to the other two, just BIGGER. Whatever. We need our Pastor to be 20 feet tall.
Erin - definitely late but figured I'd still try to join in :)
Maybe not so much about the church, but hopefully still relevant enough:
Money and Me
Interesting thoughts. I have no idea what a CLB is. I assume some church entity. I haven't been to a church for quite some time. Not for any actual service that wasn't funeral or wedding related, which alters things.
We don't tend to have projectors or screens. We don't tend to even have buildings that aren't our own homes. We gather together to supply the basics and generally worship without electronic media (although sometimes a cd player provides nice back up music when the instrumentally inclined people didn't show). We also don't take up a collection or tithe, as we have no paid clergy or building to maintain.
As such, while there is the question we like to throw around "have you ever met a rich pagan?", we have kept food cupboards open for years. Nothing so massive as the churches have done, but they are there, just from the gifts of the individuals.
It makes me wonder where your tithing might go if more of the material were sacrificed. One is a small number when I look at it, and then look at my bible (sorry if it offends you folks, but I own several and read them regularly) and I wonder what these megachurches are doing. Sure, they need huge screens and power point presentations, just like Jesus had. Sure, they need massive buildings with starbucks and mcdonalds in them, just like Jesus had. Sure they need priests and reverends, lectures and deacons and all of the rest to be raking in a paycheck in exchange for their faith, just like Jesus did.
Frankly, if you look at the above, I have no idea where you will come up with the money for the poor after all.
Chris - Thanks! I'll read it as soon as I can.
Steve - CLB is christianese for Church-left-behind. It's shorthand all us church-leavers use to identify the church we left.
I love what you said about "material stuff" because it is so true. I think maybe we could learn a lot from the more "organic" communities Pagans tend to have. I think it could be...and correct me if I'm wrong because I know little about such things...maybe Pagans have already accepted that people relate to Divinity in different ways...but Christians can't accept that people relate to Jesus in different ways...so they are forever trying to be organized - trying to be true to correct doctrine and all...
I don't know where the building thing came from...I suppose because the Jews had temples and synagogues and Jesus and his disciples preached in them so I guess it stuck as a format...even though they preached more in people's homes and in fields and in the streets.
Anyhow, your insight cracks me up...nothing like an objective perspective. But it's so true. The original post I mentioned at the beginning showed how my CLB with a 6 million dollar annual budget managed to spend less than 10% on "outreach" and "missions" (real life helping people). The rest went to buildings and programs and salaries....etc. Sigh. And they wonder why I won't go back...
I appreciate your thoughts.
And I'm tired and didn't carry out my thought in the second paragraph....
Having big church buildings led by one person makes sure we will stay true to the important things like correct doctrine and right theology (which are more important than following Jesus Himself), so we have to trust a well educated leader to keep us in line....so we're not led astray as so many fear will happen in "house churches" (more like what you described)...where people might tend to have more of a free and less structured faith. Which to most Christians is still a bad thing.
Post a Comment