Felt motivated to spruce up around the house. I'm painting my dining room. And living room. And entry. And hall. And eventually the kitchen. And the wrought-iron railing. And changing out all the outlets. And replacing the chandelier. Going to be doing the kitchen floor, too. Maybe re-staining the cabinets. And the list goes on.
So I might be a little scarce around here these days.
Painting is therapeutic for me. I turn on *world* music - because it makes me happy and energized but doesn't mess with my psyche - and I actually spend time lost in interesting conversations with God.
A few days ago I eavesdropped on two related conversations: an article written by Bob Hyatt over at Next-Wave and the ensuing discussion both there and at his blog.
I didn't engage in the discussion because I just haven't lately felt I had the emotional stamina - but a couple of my blog-world acquaintances did a fine job of covering some of what I was thinking/feeling about it. It's honestly a complicated discussion to summarize - if you aren't familiar with it and are interested in knowing more - read the links.
I don't know Bob and have never attended his church - but I have read his writing for close to two years. Based on that perspective, the Next-Wave article surprised me; not so much on the content as the tone. I think I understand why Bob feels so strongly about the importance of church community, but this article seemed more insistent on the subject than I had previously thought him to be. Quote:
However, in the comments of his blog post he defined *church* as:
However, a bigger problem still lies - at least in my neck of the woods there are scant places which are safe for formerly-known-as, disenfranchised, or otherwise de-churched Christians to gather. In the big picture, if churches and leaders really are so concerned about our spiritual well-being and are intent on coaxing us to return, they have to be willing to make hard changes. I'm not speaking from a personal or selfish perspective - my issues and current unwillingness to return to church are personal and my own - I'm speaking of us *church-leavers* as a collective.
Until a time comes when church in general begins to evolve to a focus which is outside of itself, there just aren't that many places for us to go. And as much as many of us love the idea of church with 5-10 friends, the reality is, we don't usually follow through.
As my final thought, or question as it may be, do you agree with Bob's definition of church as quoted above? MUST a gathering include those elements in order to be *church*? MUST we be engaged in such a gathering in order to be healthy Christians?
I am still not convinced. But that's just me.
So I might be a little scarce around here these days.
Painting is therapeutic for me. I turn on *world* music - because it makes me happy and energized but doesn't mess with my psyche - and I actually spend time lost in interesting conversations with God.
A few days ago I eavesdropped on two related conversations: an article written by Bob Hyatt over at Next-Wave and the ensuing discussion both there and at his blog.
I didn't engage in the discussion because I just haven't lately felt I had the emotional stamina - but a couple of my blog-world acquaintances did a fine job of covering some of what I was thinking/feeling about it. It's honestly a complicated discussion to summarize - if you aren't familiar with it and are interested in knowing more - read the links.
I don't know Bob and have never attended his church - but I have read his writing for close to two years. Based on that perspective, the Next-Wave article surprised me; not so much on the content as the tone. I think I understand why Bob feels so strongly about the importance of church community, but this article seemed more insistent on the subject than I had previously thought him to be. Quote:
"I've often wished I could write off church... It certainly would make life easier in many ways and at least I'd get to sleep in on Sundays. But, I'm beginning to think that if I truly understand the Gospel... I just can't. More and more people are declaring "I want to follow Jesus... I just can't handle church." The rise of the free-range Christian along with its attendant cynicism towards all things institutional has been one of the big stories of the last couple of years..."One unfortunate problem: in the Next-Wave article, he failed to clarify what he believes *church* to be.
"The perpetually churchless Christian wants to experience a bit of what the "spiritual but not religious" all around us seem to have. In other words, they want Christ, just not His Community."
However, in the comments of his blog post he defined *church* as:
"5 or 10 people...[who] Baptize people, take communion, serve the poor together, read and discuss Scripture and pray with and for each other. Regularly worship God together and when necessary, correct one another. If someone is doing ALL of that with their 5 or 6 friends then I have absolutely NO beef with them whatsoever. That's church."I do understand his point. I have never believed it is desirable for someone to be *unchurched* indefinitely. I also think Bob might have a unique right to say what he has said. It seems to me that he has desired to create in his church a safe place for us, free of many of the issues many of us *leavers* have problems with, and I commend that.
However, a bigger problem still lies - at least in my neck of the woods there are scant places which are safe for formerly-known-as, disenfranchised, or otherwise de-churched Christians to gather. In the big picture, if churches and leaders really are so concerned about our spiritual well-being and are intent on coaxing us to return, they have to be willing to make hard changes. I'm not speaking from a personal or selfish perspective - my issues and current unwillingness to return to church are personal and my own - I'm speaking of us *church-leavers* as a collective.
Until a time comes when church in general begins to evolve to a focus which is outside of itself, there just aren't that many places for us to go. And as much as many of us love the idea of church with 5-10 friends, the reality is, we don't usually follow through.
As my final thought, or question as it may be, do you agree with Bob's definition of church as quoted above? MUST a gathering include those elements in order to be *church*? MUST we be engaged in such a gathering in order to be healthy Christians?
I am still not convinced. But that's just me.
30 comments: