I usually have a long "to-read" blog list...whenever I come across a post that I want to read, but just don't have the time at that particular moment, I bookmark it to read later.
Once in awhile I have free time that I use to "clean up" my "to-read" list. Today was one of those days...usually once I read something on my "to-read" list, I will move the bookmark elsewhere to a more appropriate category: Articles I Dig, Stuff to Blog, or For Future Reference. This one falls into the "Stuff to Blog" category.
So anyhow...I came across this December 14th post by Scot McKnight at Jesus Creed, titled "
The Emerging-Evangelical Discussion: The One Needful thing 1"
This might be an old read for some of you...but I have to tell you how this impacted me. I have shared here and there in my posts about the change I have experienced in some close friendships during my "unchurched" season. It has been hard, as it always is when you find the people you once called "friend" really no longer are...but would be again if I were to return to church.
In this post, Scot is talking about friendship and it's ability to withstand disagreement.
"...no matter where we stand, when we are done discussing something, we still should be friends. We remain friends because we love one another, not because we are convenient for one another or support one another or agree with one another. We remain friends because we are committed to the same Person and the same Vision (Kingdom) and root our identity in the same Theo-Drama (Scripture).
...There are three kinds of friendship, and what kind we have determines whether or not we can remain friends through conversation."
Scot goes on to discuss those three kinds of friendship:
"Three Kinds of Friendship in Aristotle (NE 8.3.1-6)
1 Utility: loving another “in so far as some benefit accrues to them from each other.”
2 Pleasure: loving another “because that person is agreeable to us” or because that person “is a source of pleasure.”
3 Virtue: those who love another and so “wish the good of their friends for their friends’ sake … [and] who love each other for themselves and not accidentally.”
He goes on to say:
"A good way to measure where you are “fit” for this conversation is to see what happens to you when you disagree. Right then you’ll know if your friendship is one of utility, pleasure, or virtue.
The only genuine conversation going on is between friends of virtue."
I'll echo that: "see what happens when you disagree". I think there are some friendships that can only go so far with you...and you them.
I don't think friendships of "utility" or of "pleasure" are necessarily a bad thing...as long as you recognize them as such, and don't expect those friendships to behave as friendships of "virtue".
Jesus had different "levels" of disciples...the 72, the 12, the 3. Beth Moore talks about "the place of further still"...in Matthew 26:36-46 in the garden of Gethsemane...Jesus had the 12 who could go only so far with Him, the 3 who could go a little further yet, but in the end He had to go "further still" to pray, all alone with God. No one could come with Him.
So many of my friends could only go so far with me in this season, I have 3 that were able to go further, but for awhile it was just me and God, I had no one, no other thing, to cling to.
Virtue: Some are friends I can be honest with in my deepest pain and struggles and they will treat me gently. I can agree to disagree with them and know they are still my friends. They want what's best for me and will speak into my life accordingly.
Pleasure: Some I can share "places" in life with - social gatherings, ministry, etc. but I would not choose to reveal my innermost heart to them...not because I don't trust them but because God only intends them to have a certain level of relationship with me.
Utility: Some I can share mutual aspects of life with...like swapping babysitting or carpool, because it is useful to us to be able to share those places, but I would likely not spend much time with socially, not because I dislike them, but because that is just "how far we go" together.
I think the biggest mistake for me was in assuming and believing that all my friends were friends of "virtue", and trusting and revealing myself to them accordingly...and then struggling with the disappointment when finding out that some were only friends of "pleasure" and some were of "utility" - and that was how they viewed their relationship with me, as well. I'm not saying that some of my friends were "bad" friendships, just different.
Finding out, in the season of "disagreement" - i.e., my unchurched status, for one example - the real measure of some of my friendships was hard, and yet, I am reassured in the realization that this is the way God designed it, even for Jesus.
There is a FOURTH level of friend - The "Perfect" friend. The Friend who loves me perfectly, judges me justly, and holds me unfailingly.
So, one of the most important things for me in this season has been learning that some friends can only go so far with me, and learning to be OK with that as part of God's design. So I have had to learn to be willing to go, ALONE, closer into God, where even my friends of virtue could not accompany me.
And yet, I find, I am still not ALONE. There is a Perfect Friend who can "go there" with me.
And I am forever changed by being willing to go, alone with my Jesus, into that "place of further still" with God.